‘There Was No Debate’—Trump & Biden in Indy Media

by | Oct 2, 2020 | Commentary

By Jeremy Lovelett


Tuesday’s presidential debate disintegrated into bitter chaos after a handful of minutes. President Donald Trump fostered fear and lies about violence and voting, often trampling past his time allotment to pepper insults at former Vice President Joe Biden, who generally maintained a baseline of decorum, despite asking in exasperation, “Will you shut up, man?” Fox News moderator Chris Wallace failed to temper the evening’s cascading verbiage. He allowed Trump to talk over his own questions and heckle Biden almost constantly. The unhinged embarrassment to democracy may have benefited from Wallace and his team controlling the candidates’ microphones.

CNN’s Dana Bash accurately characterized the evening as a “shit show.” So it was, not only in conduct, but in content, as the candidates’ talking points often failed to fully address the need for improved policy or downright encouraged violence and extremism.


“Race and Violence” and Biden’s Missteps


Chris Wallace’s debate topic Race and Violence in Our Cities rang alarm bells for Nathalie Baptiste of Mother Jones. Grouping race with violence didn’t encourage a “conversation about the persistence of racial injustice in this country,” but it did give Trump a chance to “lean into his racist narrative about this country and recite his greatest racist hits.”

Trump took the opportunity, reasoning that Black people should vote for him because “law enforcement loves him.” He cited the White House’s plan to cancel critical race theory education because it’s “racist,” and warned that Biden “would allow low-income people to invade the suburbs.”

Biden countered by falsely saying the suburbs are already diverse and integrated—the former Vice President has a poor history with race relations, including his 1994 crime bill. Biden also caved on Trump’s “law and order” rallying cry, saying he’s in favor of “Law and order with justice where people get treated fairly.” But the latest shootings of Black people and protesters against injustice show that, to conservatives, “law and order” represents a call to maintain the racial hierarchy. Ignoring a summer of organized police brutality, Biden cited a few “bad apples” in police departments that need to be held accountable.

Shifting to the coronavirus pandemic, Biden rightfully pointed out the Trump administration’s failure to address the disproportionate infection and death rates among Black Americans. But he failed to capture the magnitude of disparity: Black Americans have suffered 21% of the nation’s COVID-19 death toll, even though they make up 12% of the nation’s population.

For Truthout, William Rivers Pitt defies any critic of Biden’s performance “to get through any simple recitation [on stage] with someone like Trump standing a few feet away interrupting every other sentence with frantic bellowed lies.” Though his patience was admirable, Biden avoided the Green New Deal amid mounting climate catastrophes like the west coast wildfires. He also failed to emphasize how systemic racism is killing Black people through healthcare, the environment, and law enforcement. Instead, “he chose to go haring off after his own sense of victimhood as a white Catholic,” tiptoeing on “racial insensitivity” instead of talking injustice.

Still, “these disappointments from Biden wither to ash before the blast furnace of Donald Trump’s brazen, shameless, racist fascism.”


“Stand Back and Stand By”


During Wallace’s debate topic conflating racial issues with “violence in our cities,” the moderator called on the president to denounce white supremacy. From the wreckage of verbal collision, Trump can be heard asking who to condemn as Biden and Wallace name white supremacists and the Proud Boys, a white supremacist organization classified by the Southern Poverty Law Center as a hate group. Trump instead issued a call to action to the Proud Boys: “stand back and stand by.” He suggested the left and antifa are more to blame for acts of violence, though this “directly contradicted Trump’s own Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which considers violence from right-wing groups the greatest terrorist threat to the United States at this time.”

Even Fox News personalities criticized the “non-response.” But the Proud Boys were ecstatic. Though they’re banned from Facebook and Twitter, their public Telegram channels erupted with praise for Trump’s nod with comments such as “Stand by!!! PROUD BOYS ARE HEROES!!!” on a large channel. A major group quickly updated its logo to include the president’s words emblazoned around it.

On Democracy Now!, Christian Picciolini, a former neo-Nazi who now leads the Free Radicals Project, a group focused on helping people disengage from violent extremism, described Trump’s words as clear encouragement for continued violence from far-right groups. But Trump’s refusal to condemn far-right violence has been a staple of his presidency, recently with QAnon, and previously with the Charlottesville, Virginia, attacks. The tacit endorsement aligns with his strategy to appeal to what he imagines as his paramilitary base of support. His words could embolden and galvanize extremists, who already significantly populate law enforcement and the military.


Poll Watching


Trump undermined the upcoming election by calling it rigged and maintaining that mail-in ballots are especially susceptible to fraud—there’s no evidence of this. At the end of the blundersome 90 minutes, he encouraged his supporters to watch polls “very carefully.” Though poll watching is legal to some extent in some states, his remarks “went well beyond a call for legally sanctioned and qualified election observers.”

Ignoring Wallace’s question about accepting the election results, Trump complained that poll watchers were thrown out of Philadelphia offices. As the Philadelphia Inquirer pointed out, there were many reasons for this: no Trump campaign members had been approved as watchers, no polling places are currently open, and officials are adhering to COVID-19 safety measures. Thursday morning, the Trump campaign requested that Philadelphia immediately allow them to appoint poll watchers at early-voting centers.


Media Review


Writers for Columbia Journalism Review cringed when a New York Times alert asked “Who won the debate?” This frame lost all value after the president’s “manic and abusive” performance, and media shouldn’t try to impose normality upon it; “There was no debate.” Dana Bash was right to call it a “shit show” on CNN, as was Rachel Maddow on MSNBC when she questioned the “very notion of a post-debate discussion, given what had just happened.” They’re on the right track, unlike a bevy of newspapers that likened Biden’s attempt to follow a coherent debate structure to Trump’s assault of interruption and insult. Even the Times showed it could eschew both-sides-ism with another headline: “TRUMP’S HECKLES SEND FIRST DEBATE INTO UTTER CHAOS.”

It’s possible the remaining debates will not become “more normal.” Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo writes, “This is who Trump is. It is especially who he is under threat.” But steps towards a successful evening should involve a Biden more willing to engage with intersecting issues of racial injustice, moderators who demand coherent discussion, and a mute button.

More from The Edge

For Patty Zimmermann, with Revolutionary Love

These words were written for a late-April weekend memorializing Patty Zimmermann, who was Editor-at-Large for The Edge, Director of the Finger Lakes Environmental Film Festival, Professor of Screen Studies at Ithaca College, and a fierce friend and ally.  ...

Finding My Way to Max Tohline’s ‘A Supercut of Supercuts’

We often discover new media fascinations in roundabout ways. In February of 2022, when filmmaker J.P. Sniadecki emailed me to ask if I’d seen Chloé Galibert-Laîné’s “Forensickness” (2022), I had only the vaguest sense of what had come to be called the “video essay.” I...

Complicity and Resistance in a Time of Genocidal Agony

What to Do? I am writing especially thinking about Palestinian women. They have suffered so immeasurably and grotesquely while they have tried to care for their children and their pregnancies, while being malnourished, dehydrated, starved, and heartbroken while death...

The Key to Maintaining Democracy? It’s Conversation.

On January 25th, the Harvard Kennedy School hosted a panel to discuss how candid conversations about  differences in opinion contribute to healthy democracy and social cohesion. The event, which was held on the Harvard University campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts,...

Elitism and the Rest of Us as the New Semester Begins

This week, most college and university campuses will open across the country. The ghastly war in Gaza continues and the U.S. has become more involved as it bombs Yemen. So, I am thinking about how unsettled the surround is as higher education institutions begin a new...

War Rape and the Question of Hamas

Israeli Zionist women have been speaking out these last few days to bring attention to the horrific rape of Jewish women, and the lack of outcry of feminists, for them, to this plight. They demand an indictment of Hamas and its sexual treachery towards women on...

The 10 Freeway Has Been Reopened but L.A.’s Transit Problem Remains

During the early hours of November 11, a fire erupted in a storage yard underneath the I-10 freeway near downtown Los Angeles, structurally compromising a large section of the road and resulting in, what was at the time, claimed to be an indefinite closure of the...

From My Body to Yours, and Gaza to the World

A Meditation on Death, Killing, and Possibility I knew my body was healing from the surgery when I found myself ready to engage with the world and posted on Facebook: I am always anti-zionist. And never an antisemite. And always an anti-racist feminist against...