The Supreme Court Deals Three Devastating Rulings in One Week

by | Jul 21, 2022 | News

New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen

On June 23, in a 6-3 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, the Supreme Court struck down a 109-year-old New York state law that requires gun owners who want to carry a handgun outside their homes, whether openly or concealed, to demonstrate “proper cause” and prove a that they have a unique need for self-protection before they can obtain a license to do so.

The ruling came less than six weeks after a gunman killed 21 people — 19 children and two teachers — at an elementary school in Uvalde, Texas.

This is a major setback for anti-gun violence advocates, as it vastly expands the scope of the Second Amendment. The immediate impact of Bruen is that handguns — which are responsible for the overwhelming majority of gun murders in the United States — are likely to proliferate on many American streets. That’s because Bruen strikes the types of laws that limit who can legally carry handguns in public.

The ruling has already had rippling effects in other states, with restrictions easing and the demand for easily concealed firearms increasing. It has also opened up new avenues for those fighting against California’s highly restrictive gun laws.

“That was clearly one of the goals of the justices in the majority: to shake up 2nd Amendment law and lead to the reconsideration of laws that had previously been upheld,” said Adam Winkler, a UCLA law professor who focuses on 2nd Amendment law, in an interview for the LA Times.


Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization

On Friday, June 24, the United States Supreme Court ended constitutional protections for the right to abortion. The 5-4 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization upheld a Mississippi law that banned abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy, with no exception for rape or incest and overturned the longstanding precedents of Roe v. Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992).

The decision was met with public outrage as protests broke out across the nation in objection to the ruling. Many have called the ruling a direct attack on women’s rights and claimed that ruling poses an extreme danger to women’s health as the U.S. maintains the highest maternal mortality rate in the developed world.

“In the absence of Roe, 26 states are certain or likely to move quickly to ban abortion. Of these, 13 states have “trigger laws” that ban abortion from the moment of fertilization: Arkansas, Idaho, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah and Wyoming. Another five of these states ban abortion between six and 15 weeks of pregnancy. At six weeks, an embryo is the size of a grain of rice and most women don’t even know they’re pregnant,” wrote Carrie N. Baker for Ms. Magazine.

There are fears that Dobbs may put the legal right to contraception under threat as well as other personal freedoms such as same-sex marriage and interracial marriage.

Geoffrey R. Stone, a constitutional law professor at the University of Chicago speaking with Bloomberg Law, agreed that challenges to other rights could happen soon, but it is uncertain whether the Supreme Court will overturn them in the same manner as Roe.

“I think they’re less likely to overturn those decisions because they don’t feel the same degree of popular opposition to those decisions as existed with at least 30 to 40 percent of the American people with respect to abortion,” Stone said. “But who knows?”


West Virginia v. EPA

By a 6-3 vote, the Supreme Court ruled on June 30 that the Clean Air Act does not give the Environmental Protection Agency broad authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from power plants that contribute to global climate change.

The decision, made by the conservative-majority court, is a devastating step in the wrong direction in the fight against human-induced global warming. The ruling states that the Environmental Protection Agency cannot require states to decarbonize their electricity sectors, “a decision that is expected to dramatically slow the United States’ ability to reduce greenhouse gases and mitigate the effects of climate change,” says Erin Douglas of the Texas Tribune.

The decision’s use of the controversial “major questions” legal doctrine — invented by the Supreme Court, which places strict limits on a federal agency’s ability to “exercise powers of vast economic and political significance” — could have a chilling effect on future regulations.

The major questions doctrine “largely just functions as a veto power, allowing judges to justify blocking nearly any regulation they do not like,” said Harvard law professor Richard Lazarus, an expert on environmental law.

“That’s a very big deal because they’re not going to get it from Congress because Congress is essentially dysfunctional,” Lazarus said. “This could not have come at a worse time” because “the consequences of climate change are increasingly dire and we’re running out of time to address it.”


Image via Brandon Bell/Getty Images


More from The Edge

How to See Wars Beyond the Frame

Wars are ubiquitous in the everyday lives of people who imagine themselves living in peace. Yet, it is easy not to see them — to acknowledge neighbors as veterans, recognize war widows in their role as caregivers, interpret war monuments as celebrations of violence,...

Post-Roe ‘Dirty Dancing’ Memes Lose the Thread

I was in a Zoom meeting when I got the Variety news alert about Roe v. Wade being overturned. Given our current moment, this constellation of virtuality, entertainment, and mortally devastating news felt depressingly familiar. Also familiar was the disorienting...

Professors Are the How

Dedicated to David Turkon (1953-2022)   A colleague floated a wager. Who can spot the most faculty in a day? Someone reported eight sightings in our three-story campus building. They won. Another colleague texts pictures each week of the empty parking lots on...


So many of us are busy trying to alleviate the pain of overturning Roe while knowing how inadequate all these piecemeal attempts are, including voting Republicans out of office! We want to embrace the importance of doing everything we can on all fronts, while not...

The Post-Roe Police State: Reproductive Justice Demands Freedom

The attack on Roe and reproductive rights is an attack on democracy — connected and not dissimilar to the January 6 riot at the capitol. As all eyes are on the January 6 hearings, I want to connect the assault on women’s bodies, in all their variety, especially Black...

How Aquariums and Conventional Nature Films Greenwash Animal Pain

Humans try to camouflage their atrocious behavior toward their planetary cohabitants. The experimental videos of Pawał Wojtasik explore the consequences of the coercive and exploitative entanglements of humans and animals beyond the corporate media of Amazon, Disney,...

Overturning Roe v. Wade is Immoral and Dangerous

I no longer have a uterus. But I do have two daughters, 18 and 20. And I am horrified and enraged by the loss of the constitutional right to abortion. In 2022, according to a Supreme Court majority, states cannot regulate gun ownership, but they can — and should —...

Lovers, Baby: Reading the Landscape in Virginia

During my childhood, the only association I had with Virginia was cigarettes, as in Virginia Slims, a brand that promoted smoking as a form of glamorous liberation for women long after we knew cigarettes were deadly. That slogan was “You’ve come a long way, baby” and...