Kings Bay plowshares seven begin arguing defense in court

by | Oct 24, 2019 | Commentary, News

Inside a sterile, but lavish wood paneled courtroom in Brunswick, Ga. Monday, the Kings Bay plowshares seven, formally opened their legal argument, providing hints to what Judge Lisa Godbey Wood would allow.

The government, represented by Assistant U.S. Attorney Karl Knoche, objected three times during the opening statements presented by Clare Grady and defense attorney Bill Quigley, who spoke on behalf of Elizabeth McAlister.

The first objection was made against Quigley, who hypothetically asked if an act of “symbolic disarmament,” the term used by the plowshares to describe their action at the Kings Bay base, should be worthy of prison time. Wood interjected, reminding jurors that “punishment will not be considered” in their deliberation over the evidence presented in the trial.

Following Quigley’s opening on behalf of McAlister, Clare Grady, addressed the jury. She described her family, service work and love for the outdoors.

“I love being out in the natural world, not in jail,” she said prompting Knoche to slowly utter an objection.

“I’m sorry, that wasn’t even in my notes,” Grady piped. She added that she would like to go back to Ithaca, N.Y. to harvest garlic and weeks in the community garden and moved on with her remarks.

She continued on for several minutes, but when she started discussing the legality of nuclear weapons, Wood’s gaze moved on her like a hawk, waiting for an objection from Knoche at any moment. Just as Grady began to quote from Isaiah, Knoche objected, Wood, began to acknowledge the objection, but before she could Grady wrapped up, leaving the stand.

In pre-trial hearings, the defense acknowledged it would try to make several arguments as to why the activists actions are legal, the same arguments that have been made in plowshares actions dating back to the 80’s: the action was necessary to prevent an immediate threat to the world, the possession of nuclear weapons is against the group’s pacifist religious practices, and that possessing nuclear weapons was against international law. The court, as all have done in the past, ruled that the plowshares defendants could not pose these arguments during trial.

As the clock was nearing 5:00 p.m., Wood decided to dismiss the jury to their quarters before adjourning the court.

As soon as they left the room, Wood took to addressing the defendants, attempting to draw the lines of what was permissible under the restriction of arguments.

“I am trying to give you as much leeway as possible,” Wood said, adding “this is not a forum to convert people to a particular religion.”

The physical courtroom audience was void of all but four members of the media as marshalls did not transfer the occupants of an overflow room after the majority of jurors had been dismissed.

That process took most of the day, with the 14 jurors only locked in at 3:49 p.m.. During the selection, the presence and impact of the Kings Bay base and military as a whole hold in the community.

At times, jurors were asked if they had been employed by the government, visited the Kings Bay base recently, and if they already knew about the action by the plowshares activists. 18 had been employed, 11 visited, and a staggering 24 already knew about the case. But of the roughly 70 jurors, none indicated that they “had strong opinions about nuclear weapons.”

“That kinda says something about the community at large, right? This is not a matter of importance to people,” defendant Pat O’Neill said outside the courthouse. “So that’s why we’re here.”

More from The Edge

The 10 Freeway Has Been Reopened but L.A.’s Transit Problem Remains

During the early hours of November 11, a fire erupted in a storage yard underneath the I-10 freeway near downtown Los Angeles, structurally compromising a large section of the road and resulting in, what was at the time, claimed to be an indefinite closure of the...

From My Body to Yours, and Gaza to the World

A Meditation on Death, Killing, and Possibility I knew my body was healing from the surgery when I found myself ready to engage with the world and posted on Facebook: I am always anti-zionist. And never an antisemite. And always an anti-racist feminist against...

On the Tragic Inevitability of Stacking Corpses

War. Genocide. Pandemics. Heat. Famine. Racism. Misogyny. Hunger. Violence. There are so many ways for mortal beings to die, especially the most vulnerable, and too often these deaths are state sponsored, sped by capitalism, and/or preventable. We — humans and...

“Barbie”: An Anti-Racist Socialist Feminist Meditation

I started writing this the day “Barbie” was opening in the theatres. I had not seen it yet, because I am writing less about the film and more about the cultural and political moment we inhabit as it opens. I went as soon as I finished an early draft, exactly one week...

Supreme Court Ruling in Stalking Case Hurts Victims

Stalking is a social and public health emergency. Unfortunately, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Counterman v. Colorado makes things easier for abusers and harder for victims. A form of gender-based violence, stalking affects more than 13 million people annually in the...

The Rogue Court’s Reactionary Radicalism

This Is a Catastrophe. I am finishing the writing of this piece shortly after the July 4 holiday. This is significant — to wonder who this country is now, and before. I began writing it while riding the bus into NYC from Ithaca, NY, on Friday, June 30, while the last...

Held vs. Montana: The Future of the Climate Crisis Fight

As the courtroom seats began filling in the first judicial court in Helena, the capital city of Montana, local community members and officials prepared to hear the long-awaited testimonies from plaintiffs who allege state officials have violated their constitutional...