Current Inflation has ‘Everything To Do with Corporate Greed’

by | Dec 1, 2021 | Commentary

Rising inflation in the United States has captured headlines during November. Mainstream media outlets have been warning of increasingly expensive commodities like coffee and deciding where to assign blame — including to Joe Biden, to Americans themselves, and far too rarely, to corporate greed.

A bevy of factors contribute to rising inflation levels, including interruptions in the supply chain, increased labor costs, and rising demand for goods. But a key force driving up prices is the U.S.’s mega-corporations.

In a competitive market, profit margins should approach zero, given that consumers can finds substitutes for products. But corporate profits have surged over the past two decades, reaching new heights in recent months as prices increased. As Judd Legum explains, “corporations are not being forced to raise prices to stay afloat. They are choosing to raise prices to maintain large profit margins because they have enough market power to do so without losing customers.”

Procter & Gamble (P&G), a leading consumer product company, announced a price raise in April 2021 for household staples from diapers to toilet paper. It reported in the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2021, a profit of $3.785 billion, amounting to a 20.9% profit margin compared to total sales.

In the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2021, after some of P&G’s price increases went into effect, the company reported a profit of $5.06 billion, representing a profit margin of 24.7%. The company attributes its price increases to the “rising costs for raw materials, such as resin and pulp, and higher expenses to transport goods,” but its climbing profits tell a different story.

While competitors should ideally undercut P&G to keep prices of goods like diapers down, not much competition exists. Its main competitor, Kimberly-Clark, announced similar price increases at the same time.

These rising costs hurt those who can least afford them while disbursing the gains to wealthy shareholders and executives. According to Rakeen Mabud, Chief Economist at the Groundwork Collaborative, “This has nothing to do with inflation, and everything to do with corporate greed by those who are focused on enriching themselves at the expense of workers and families.”

PepsiCo, Coca-Cola, Whirlpool, and supermarket chains Albertsons and Kroger all announced price hikes and have reaped gains, with the CEO of the latter admitting, “A little bit of inflation is always good in our business.” Dollar Tree CEO Michael Witynski recently announced his company’s price raise to $1.25 in the U.S., citing the “inflationary environment.”

As Warren Gunnels, majority staff director for Senate Budget Committee Chair Bernie Sanders, pointed out on twitter, the wealth accrued by Dollar Tree and subsequently swept to its administrators stands in stark contrast to the low wages earned by its employees.

On FAIR’s CounterSpin, writer for The Intercept Jon Schwarz discussed the need to question when corporate media collectively pushes the same issue. In this case, The New York Times, CNN, and CNBC, among others, have been ringing alarm bells about how inflation may hurt working Americans. But as Shwarz explains, the current figure of 6.2% inflation also “works out to a transfer of wealth from creditors to debtors of about $850 billion,” because debt sits at a fixed rate while inflation lowers the value of the dollar.

This doesn’t represent a one-to-one wealth transfer from rich to poor, “But it is a significant amount. And you may have noticed people with a lot of money do not like to lose it. And that’s really at the root of this inflation freak-out.”

Corporate media has used inflation as a partisan weapon to fling back and forth, and invoked workers solely for their economic utility. While reporting on current price hikes, media has the responsibility to outline how corporate greed, in addition to supply chain and labor woes, is contributing to the financial impact on Americans.


Photo by Anna Shvets / Pexels

More from The Edge

Media Negligence and Hate Costs LGBTQ Lives

On Sunday, November 20, five people were killed and more than 20 injured in a shooting at the LGBTQ nightclub Club Q in Colorado Springs, Colorado, as the club hosted a drag show and planned a drag brunch the following morning to honor Transgender Day of Remembrance....

How Native Advertising Misleads Readers and Damages Credibility

In 2019, the Massachusetts Attorney General sued Exxon Mobil for deceiving state residents about the company’s contributions to climate change. One exhibit in the lawsuit was a piece of “native advertising,” paid content disguised as a news article, in The New York...

How Demagogues Harness Social Media

Despite clear visual evidence to the contrary, former President Donald Trump and his press secretary, Sean Spicer, insisted that his inauguration crowd had been larger than the one at President Obama’s inauguration in 2008. In a series of experiments done not long...

The Case for Transparency Over Objectivity

Earlier this month, James Geary, an editor at Nieman Reports, published a letter calling into question the role of objectivity in journalism. He referenced two stories: In the first, a Black teenager in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, was named as a kidnapping suspect...

#TheHolocaust on Social Media

“What if a girl in the Holocaust had Instagram?” The Instagram account @eva.stories is a social media project produced by Israeli tech entrepreneur Mati Kochavi. It launched on May 1, 2019, the day before Yom HaShoah, Israel’s annual Holocaust Martyrs’ and Heroes’...

Is the Video Essay a New Avant-Garde?

The recent emergence of what has come to be called the video essay or the videographic essay or the audiovisual essay represents a new cinematic avant-garde. It offers implicit and explicit critiques of both commercial media and the logocentric literature of academic...