Facebook Tuned its Algorithm to Hinder Progressive Outlets

by | Oct 23, 2020 | Commentary, News

In late 2017, Facebook executives were briefed on major changes to the platform’s News Feed—the code that determines which of innumerable posts appear when a user views Facebook. The changes would reduce how much news people saw, and therefore decrease outlets’ revenue. For Mother Jones, the decline in Facebook audience over the following 18 months translated “into a loss of at least $600,000.”

Facebook was moving back to prioritize friends, “bring people closer together,” and promote “trusted” news pieces, as it told the public.

But the public only recently found out, through reporting by The Wall Street Journal and further coverage by Mother Jones, that Facebook ran tests to see how the changes would affect publishers. And when the company found that some changes would dramatically limit the reach of right-wing “junk sites,” as a former Facebook employee put it, the engineers were instructed to lessen those impacts. The result was an algorithm that “dialed up the harm to progressive-leaning news organizations instead.”

Following the Wall Street Journal’s report, Mother Jones Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery took to Twitter to highlight the damage and conservative pandering that surrounds these changes. Jeffery noted that Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, who approved the revised algorithm to favor right-wing news, had conservative commentator Ben Shapiro of the Daily Wire over as a dinner guest at his house. Zuckerberg maintained no such relationships with personalities from the left, and Jeffery called out the hypocrisy of enacting the algorithm changes for partisan balance, saying, “Hey Mark, I only live a few blocks from you.” Last year, Jeffery and Mother Jones CEO Monika Bauerlein wrote a piece that took Facebook to task for allowing fake news and hate speech to fester while sidelining real journalism. Now they know this was a conscious effort.

Back in 2017, Facebook executives were shown a slide show with graphs outlining how the revised algorithm would cause about a dozen left-leaning outlets—including Mother Jones—to suffer. Mother Jones’s Ben Dreyfuss, who oversaw the outlet’s social media strategy, had several meetings with Facebook executives in 2017 and 2018 following the algorithm changes. He was assured “all publishers should expect traffic and engagement to go down a bit, but not in a way that favored or disfavored any single publication or class of publisher.” At the time, he vouched for Facebook, saying the situation didn’t seem dire.

But as Dreyfuss and the social media team saw readership decline, he was frustrated to keep running into walls. Most recently, Dreyfuss was infuriated to learn that those walls were placed intentionally to limit their reach on the platform. Despite Facebook’s assurances since the news broke that it “did not make changes with the intent of impacting individual publishers,” Dreyfuss observes that “Ben Shapiro and conservative sites did indeed win from those algorithmic changes, and Mother Jones and progressive sites did indeed lose.”

More from The Edge

The 10 Freeway Has Been Reopened but L.A.’s Transit Problem Remains

During the early hours of November 11, a fire erupted in a storage yard underneath the I-10 freeway near downtown Los Angeles, structurally compromising a large section of the road and resulting in, what was at the time, claimed to be an indefinite closure of the...

From My Body to Yours, and Gaza to the World

A Meditation on Death, Killing, and Possibility I knew my body was healing from the surgery when I found myself ready to engage with the world and posted on Facebook: I am always anti-zionist. And never an antisemite. And always an anti-racist feminist against...

On the Tragic Inevitability of Stacking Corpses

War. Genocide. Pandemics. Heat. Famine. Racism. Misogyny. Hunger. Violence. There are so many ways for mortal beings to die, especially the most vulnerable, and too often these deaths are state sponsored, sped by capitalism, and/or preventable. We — humans and...

“Barbie”: An Anti-Racist Socialist Feminist Meditation

I started writing this the day “Barbie” was opening in the theatres. I had not seen it yet, because I am writing less about the film and more about the cultural and political moment we inhabit as it opens. I went as soon as I finished an early draft, exactly one week...

Supreme Court Ruling in Stalking Case Hurts Victims

Stalking is a social and public health emergency. Unfortunately, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Counterman v. Colorado makes things easier for abusers and harder for victims. A form of gender-based violence, stalking affects more than 13 million people annually in the...

The Rogue Court’s Reactionary Radicalism

This Is a Catastrophe. I am finishing the writing of this piece shortly after the July 4 holiday. This is significant — to wonder who this country is now, and before. I began writing it while riding the bus into NYC from Ithaca, NY, on Friday, June 30, while the last...

Held vs. Montana: The Future of the Climate Crisis Fight

As the courtroom seats began filling in the first judicial court in Helena, the capital city of Montana, local community members and officials prepared to hear the long-awaited testimonies from plaintiffs who allege state officials have violated their constitutional...