‘Balanced’ Coverage Hides Context for Shireen Abu Akleh’s Killing

by | Jun 9, 2022 | News

On May 11, Palestinian-American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh, an Al Jazeera reporter who covered Palestine for two decades, was shot and killed while covering an Israeli military raid in the Jenin refugee camp in the occupied West Bank. Even as evidence mounted that Israeli forces had opened fire on her and nearby journalists, U.S. media’s coverage in many cases committed to a back-and-forth framing involving Israeli and Palestinian forces, obscuring who was responsible.

In the weeks that followed Abu Akleh’s death, research groups, human rights groups, and news organizations undertook investigations to determine who killed her, with outlets including CNN and the Associated Press finding evidence that Israeli forces were responsible.

AP reported: “Multiple videos and photos taken on the morning of May 11 show an Israeli convoy parked just up a narrow road from Abu Akleh, with a clear line of sight. They show the reporters and other bystanders in real time taking cover from bullets fired from the direction of the convoy.”

“The only confirmed presence of Palestinian militants was on the other side of the convoy, some 300 meters (yards) away, mostly separated from Abu Akleh by buildings and walls,” AP wrote. This contradicts Israeli officials, who circulated a video that they claimed showed a Palestinian militant shooting in the area. Eyewitnesses said there were no militants in the area and no gunfire until the salvo that killed Abu Akleh and injured another reporter.

Two weeks after the killing, FAIR evaluated coverage by U.S. corporate media, which the outlet said eschewed “The context of escalating Israeli attacks on freedom of the press and on journalists in the Occupied Territories.”

The New York Times initially wrote Abu Akleh was “shot as clashes between the Israeli military and Palestinian gunmen took place in the city,” with the opening paragraphs of that piece establisingh a dichotomy between Al Jazeera and Israeli officials. The Times quoted Al Jazeera saying the outlet “holds the Israeli government and the occupation forces responsible for the killing of Shireen,” then quoted the Israeli military chief of staff and minister of defense, who “emphasized the uncertainty” of whether it was Israeli or Palestinian forces who killed her.

In another article, the Times moved from a profile of the journalist into a “both-sides” framing: “She was shot in the head in the West Bank city of Jenin, Al Jazeera and the Palestinian Health Ministry said, blaming Israeli forces for her death. The Israeli military said on Twitter that ‘Palestinian armed gunfire’ might have been responsible.”

ABC News coverage of the killing employed a similar structure, saying, “The head of the Palestinian Authority blamed Israel for her death and rejected Israeli calls for a joint investigation.”

More recently, The New York Times editorial board published a piece entitled “Who Killed Journalist Shireen Abu Akleh?” apparently leaning further into a “balanced” framing of the killing. The editorial board purported that “The world still knows very little about who is responsible for her death.”

Amid the forensic investigation, the Times said “the two sides are at loggerheads,” as Palestine holds the bullet that killed Abu Akleh and Israel holds the rifle. After describing the Palestinian Authority’s two-week investigation into the killing, the Times added a dismissal: “Israel rejected any suggestion that the killing was deliberate, calling the allegation a ‘blatant lie.’”

The Times article mentioned investigations by news organizations such as CNN, which reported that the evidence suggested “Abu Akleh was shot dead in a targeted attack by Israeli forces.” The editorial board then said “Israel reacted sharply,” with President Isaac Herzog rejecting the report and claiming it was based on “fake facts.” The article said Herzog’s rejection makes it more important “to get a full accurate accounting” with an independent investigation conducted with American, Israeli and Palestinian participation.

FAIR wrote of coverage prior to the Times editorial board’s piece, “The reporting illustrated how ‘balance’ and fragments of disjointed ‘facts’ have become a stylistic method to confuse and obliterate meaningful connections that drain compassion, outrage and demands for justice for the victims of state violence.”

 

Image by Mahmoud Ajjour / The Palestine Chronicle

 

More from The Edge

The 10 Freeway Has Been Reopened but L.A.’s Transit Problem Remains

During the early hours of November 11, a fire erupted in a storage yard underneath the I-10 freeway near downtown Los Angeles, structurally compromising a large section of the road and resulting in, what was at the time, claimed to be an indefinite closure of the...

From My Body to Yours, and Gaza to the World

A Meditation on Death, Killing, and Possibility I knew my body was healing from the surgery when I found myself ready to engage with the world and posted on Facebook: I am always anti-zionist. And never an antisemite. And always an anti-racist feminist against...

On the Tragic Inevitability of Stacking Corpses

War. Genocide. Pandemics. Heat. Famine. Racism. Misogyny. Hunger. Violence. There are so many ways for mortal beings to die, especially the most vulnerable, and too often these deaths are state sponsored, sped by capitalism, and/or preventable. We — humans and...

“Barbie”: An Anti-Racist Socialist Feminist Meditation

I started writing this the day “Barbie” was opening in the theatres. I had not seen it yet, because I am writing less about the film and more about the cultural and political moment we inhabit as it opens. I went as soon as I finished an early draft, exactly one week...

Supreme Court Ruling in Stalking Case Hurts Victims

Stalking is a social and public health emergency. Unfortunately, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Counterman v. Colorado makes things easier for abusers and harder for victims. A form of gender-based violence, stalking affects more than 13 million people annually in the...

The Rogue Court’s Reactionary Radicalism

This Is a Catastrophe. I am finishing the writing of this piece shortly after the July 4 holiday. This is significant — to wonder who this country is now, and before. I began writing it while riding the bus into NYC from Ithaca, NY, on Friday, June 30, while the last...

Held vs. Montana: The Future of the Climate Crisis Fight

As the courtroom seats began filling in the first judicial court in Helena, the capital city of Montana, local community members and officials prepared to hear the long-awaited testimonies from plaintiffs who allege state officials have violated their constitutional...